-
Hey @larryelder, you were incorrect (or choose to misrepresent) the 303 Creative case before the Supreme Court on @Rashad_Richey. The plaintiff has no injury. She does not make wedding websites currently and, as such, has never refused making one for a same-sex couple.Permalink On twitter.com
AaronGustafson
❤️ 1 Favorites Mood -1 🙁
-
She would like the Supreme Court to give her permission to violate Colorado’s civil rights law and openly advertise her bigotry toward members of that protected class.Permalink On twitter.com
-
Also: web design is not artistic expression. Art serves the artist; design serves someone else (typically the client or their audience). And I should know, I’ve been a web designer for 26 years. More: aaron-gustafson.com/notebook/303-creative-llc-v-elenis-is-incredibly-problematic/On twitter.com