-
On twitter.com
AaronGustafson
❤️ 4 Favorites Mood -3 🙁
-
@felquis @Spellacy I mean I agree not everything is enhance-able, but most interfaces have a basic fallback.Permalink On twitter.com
-
@felquis @Spellacy And if it's a public site or a necessary service (government, bank, utility, medical etc.) you need as much coverage as possible. You don't control the environment your code executes in.Permalink On twitter.com
-
@felquis @Spellacy If you’re running a business, you probably want the additional resilience progressive enhancement provides. More potential users == more profits.Permalink On twitter.com
-
@felquis @Spellacy And happier users (who can do what they need to do in your sure, no matter what) means more word of mouth promotion of your product.Permalink On twitter.com
-
@felquis @Spellacy Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying you need to provide the same experience to everyone, that’d be a waste of effort. But providing a usable baseline means your sure will still work no matter what.Permalink On twitter.com
-
Permalink
On twitter.com
-
@felquis @Spellacy Just ask the folks who depended on jQuery (from the official CDN) to provide their site’s interface & functionality.Permalink On twitter.com
-
@felquis @Spellacy The majority of the time, things will run as you expect them to, but man, when something happens, it really sucks.Permalink On twitter.com
-
@felquis @Spellacy And one last thing: don't rely on your analytics to tell you when issues like JavaScript falling over happen… most of them also rely on JavaScript. Take analytics with a grain of salt.Permalink On twitter.com
-
@felquis @Spellacy This was a good study from the UK: gds.blog.gov.uk/2013/10/21/how-many-people-are-missing-out-on-javascript-enhancement/Permalink On twitter.com